WDEshleman@aol.com
Wed, 25 Aug 1999 08:06:27 EDT
In a message dated 8/25/99 6:23:08 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
matpitka@pcu.helsinki.fi writes:
> I am not quite sure: perhaps we have different basic interpretation
> but I do not quite get you idea.
>
Matti,
No doubt this is true, but it is I who need to catch up.
I would just feel better if the initial objective object
possessed infinite fine and super structure instead
of being proposed as a finite-dimension surface in a
finite-dimension space that reveals more hidden
structure only after being further analyzed.
Sincerely,
Bill
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Oct 16 1999 - 00:36:30 JST