[time 552] Re: [time 543] Re: [time 542] Re: [time 541] Re: [time 529] Discussion shift


Matti Pitkanen (matpitka@pcu.helsinki.fi)
Mon, 16 Aug 1999 19:38:58 +0300 (EET DST)


I cannot comment much since I could not get to the page
were the material about Lorentz factors is.

On Sat, 14 Aug 1999 WDEshleman@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 8/13/99 11:26:39 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> stephenk1@home.com writes:
>
> > >What I speculate on is the possibility that signals
> > > are copied into MWs; ie, matter reveals itself as photons in other
> > >worlds and photons in our world reveal matter in other worlds. (Bill)
> >
> > Umm, are you familiar with the supersymmetry transformation that
> > involves the transformation of bosons (such as photons) into fermions
> > (such as electrons, protons, etc.) and vise versa. I have always
> > wondered why such a beautiful symmetry is not experimentally obvious.
> > Maybe because we are looking too hard for it! :-) In my thinking the
> > Universe objects are composed of quantum systems (no "ultimate
> > indivisible particles") to for local systems, these quantum systems
> > would, if we suppose that the "Super Poincare" symmetry is real, have
> > both "matter" and "photon" properties. Now, what if we fail to see the
> > multitude of particles that the usual interpretation of supersymmetry
> > generates for the same reason that we do not see the other worlds?
> >
>
> Yes, what I should have said was:
> "What I speculate on is the possibility that signals are copied into MWs;
> ie, FERMIONS reveal themselves as BOSONS in other worlds and
> BOSONS in our world reveal FERMIONS in other worlds. Everett
> once told his boss J. A. Wheeler something like this, "we can no
> more feel the presence of other worlds than we can feel the spin of
> the Earth." I'm sure Everett used other words, but that is how I stored
> it. And, my speculation is that the Lorentz factor is itself the result
> of a product of many small signals reflected from the multitude.
>

I have been accustomed to think that parallel worlds are absolutely
unable to communicate with each other. I mean parallel as worlds in
quantum superpositions (spacetime surfaces in TGD). There is second type
of parallelity corresponding to tensor product and in this case
communication is possible.

I cannot comment anything about product representations of Lorentz
factors since I could not get to the page
were the material about Lorentz factors is.

> Sincerely,
>
> Bill
> http://members.tripod.com/~EshlemanW/
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Oct 16 1999 - 00:36:29 JST